

Related Articles
Four feared dead after tugboat collision with Ghogha – Dahej Ro Ro Ferry Boat
Today in Bhavnagar , four persons feared dead in tugboat collision with Ghogha – Dahej Ro Ro Ferry Boat. One Varun Tugboat which was providing diesel to Ro Ro Ferry Boat sank after collision and fire near Piram bet. Tugboat sank in just 40 seconds. In the mishap 4 persons are feared to be dead […]
Six workers buried inside Chimney in Cement factory at Ranavav
In Ranavav Cement Works Site of HATHI-SIDDHEE CEMENT (The Mehta Group Company , Group owned by Jay Mehta, Husband of Indian Cinema Actress Juhi Chawla. SIX (6) workers were reported to have buried inside the chimney following the structure collapsed suddenly.
Vijay Rupani tested Covid-19 positive post his ill health
A health bulletin by Dr RK Patel of UN Mehta Hospital was issued. Last night during health check-up of Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani was conducted including RT-PCR test was done. Today CM Rupani was tested Covid-19 positive. https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=1070630776776512 Yesterday Gujarat Chief Minister Rupani fell unconscious while addressing an event in Vadodara in Nizampura at […]
The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutional validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act, 2018, and said a court can grant anticipatory bail only in cases where a prima facie case is not made out.
A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said a preliminary inquiry is not essential before lodging an FIR under the act and the approval of senior police officials is not needed.
Justice Ravindra Bhat, the other member of the bench, said in a concurring verdict that every citizen needs to treat fellow citizens equally and foster the concept of fraternity.
Justice Bhat said a court can quash the FIR if a prima facie case is not made out under the SC/ST Act and the liberal use of anticipatory bail will defeat the intention of Parliament.
The top court’s verdict came on a batch of PILs challenging the validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act of 2018, which was brought to nullify the effect of the apex court’s 2018 ruling, which had diluted the provisions of the stringent Act.